Skip to main content
News - 
Global

IOM Launches Survey: Human Trafficking and Exploitation Prevalence on Eastern Mediterranean Migrant Routes

Switzerland - IOM has found that nearly 1 in 10 migrant and refugee respondents have answered positively to an indicator of the presence of human trafficking and other exploitative practices along the eastern Mediterranean migration route.

The results are the first from new operations in six countries along the route to estimate the prevalence of behavior indicating the presence of human trafficking and other exploitative practices, which pose a grave threat to migrants and refugees on their journey. While there have been many anecdotal reports and qualitative studies, this is the first attempt of its kind to try to quantify the problem.

The Human Trafficking and Other Exploitative Practices Prevalence Indication Survey has been conducted as part of IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) flow monitoring operations, starting in December 2015, with nearly 2,400 migrants and refugees in Croatia, Greece, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Hungary, Serbia, and Slovenia. Its 21 questions have been translated into Arabic, Dari, Pashtu, Urdu, French, and Farsi. Data collection is ongoing and IOM aims to regularly share quality information on trafficking in persons with all relevant counter-trafficking response actors.

7.2 percent of respondents answered ‘yes’ to at least one of the trafficking and other exploitative practices indicators based on their own direct experience – including having worked or performed activities during the journey without getting payment they expected; being forced to perform work or other activities against their will during their journey; being approached during their journey by someone offering employment; being approached by someone offering to arrange a marriage; being held at a location against their will during their journey by parties other than any relevant governmental authorities.

An additional 1.4 percent of respondents had said that while they had not directly experienced situations captured by one of the trafficking and exploitation indicators, a member of their family travelling with them had. 0.9 percent of respondents reported that they knew of instances where people on the journey had been approached by someone offering cash in exchange for giving blood, organs or a body part.

Further results of the study can be found here.

“These are very worrying figures, particularly with annual arrivals approaching one million people on this route,” said Mathieu Luciano, Head, Assistance to Vulnerable Migrants Unit, IOM Geneva.  “Since human trafficking and other forms of exploitative practices are clandestine by nature, these experiences are likely to be just the tip of the iceberg.”

Respondents who answered positively to one of the indicators were more than two years younger, on average, than those answering negatively. Those who were travelling alone were more likely to answer positively than those in a group. Moreover, rates were higher among men than women. Afghans, Syrians, and Pakistanis reported higher rates than other nationalities.

IOM calls for national and international law enforcement agencies and humanitarian actors to act upon this information and increase their efforts to detect crimes of human trafficking and other exploitative practices, identify victims, and prevent vulnerable populations from being preyed upon. Migrants and refugees must be better informed about – and able to avail themselves of – their basic human rights under national and international law.

As well as providing direct assistance to victims of trafficking, IOM aims to build the capacity of front-line actors to help ensure that victims of trafficking are increasingly identified and referred to appropriate services, through the development of tailored curricula and training.

IOM continues to advocate for the presence of counter-trafficking specialists at key transit points, reception centres and registration sites. IOM also aims to increase awareness among vulnerable populations of trafficking-in-persons’ risk factors, including through mobile applications.

Finally, IOM and Interpol have a longstanding working relationship and the two organizations are working together to ensure that issues of concern raised in the field are appropriately referred.

The survey has been conducted with the support of IOM’s Migrant Assistance Department. IOM's DTM migration flow monitoring operations in Europe have been funded by ECHO (European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection department), SDC (Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation) and DFID (United Kingdom Department for International Development). Further data from IOM’s migration flow monitoring operations can be found here http://migration.iom.int/europe/

For further information, please contact Harry Cook, IOM Geneva,  Tel: +41 227 179 502, Email: hcook@iom.int

Share this page via:

Regions
Office type
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Asia and the Pacific
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas (The)
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Central African Republic (the)
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros (the)
Congo (the)
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czechia
Democratic Republic of the Congo (the)
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic (the)
East and Horn of Africa
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Europe and Central Asia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia (the)
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Global Office in Brussels
Global Office in Washington
Greece
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
IOM Office at the United Nations
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Iraq
Ireland
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic (the)
Latin America and the Caribbean
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Manila Administrative Centre
Marshall Islands (the)
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia (Federated States of)
Middle East and North Africa
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger (the)
Nigeria
North Macedonia
Norway
Pakistan
Palau
Panama
Panama Administrative Centre
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines (the)
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Republic of Moldova (the)
Romania
Russian Federation (the)
Rwanda
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Subregional Office in Brussels
Subregional Office in Pretoria
Sudan (the)
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic (the)
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Türkiye
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
United Republic of Tanzania (the)
UNSC Resolution 1244-Administered Kosovo
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Viet Nam
West and Central Africa
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe