Skip to main content
News - 
Global

Mongolia’s Ban on Moving to Overcrowded Capital Hurt Migrants: IOM Research

Ulaanbaatar – Research by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in Mongolia shows a migration ban aimed at reducing overpopulation in Ulaanbaatar only increased the vulnerabilities of the capital city’s urban migrants. 

IOM found that rural-to-urban migration improved the lives of most internal migrants in Mongolia,  providing them with more and better job opportunities and increasing their incomes. 

Due to development discrepancies between rural areas and the capital, Mongolia has experienced a dramatic rural-to-urban migration flow, raising Ulaanbaatar’s population to almost 1.5 million – half the country’s total, according to its 2020 census. 

The Municipality of Ulaanbaatar shut the door to new residents with annual bans between 2017 and 2020 in a bid to protect health and safety, and the environment, but given IOM's findings, it will not reintroduce a ban.  

“The city administration does not intend to impose another migration ban as the study clearly shows that the ban did not achieve its intended purpose,” Deputy Mayor R. Dagva told a high-level panel discussion on Internal Migration in Mongolia.  

“It is important to understand that the ban, based on the underlying opportunities and circumstances of the time, was an attempt to regulate migration.”  

IOM's research findings – from two studies – were released during the panel discussion last month. The first study, Assessing the Effectiveness of Migration Restrictions in Ulaanbaatar City and Migrants’ Vulnerability, shows that while the ban prevented registration for official residency, it did not stop the flow of people into the city.  

The lack of residency registration deepened the vulnerability of migrant households, as they could not access public services and suffered from exposure to economic, social and health risks. 

The second study, Mongolia: Internal Migration and Employment, showed that better job opportunities, living conditions and education are the key factors pulling internal migrants into Ulaanbaatar.      

“The internal migration issue is complex, and we should expect the response policies to be as sophisticated,” said Victor Lutenco, IOM Mongolia Programme Manager. 

"By substituting restrictive policies with those supporting better integration of migrants, Ulaanbaatar and Mongolia will ensure that migration and migrants fill the ranks of the net contributors to the development of the receiving community and of the entire country.”  

IOM cooperated with the National University of Mongolia and Independent Research Institute of Mongolia to conduct the research in Ulaanbaatar, having support from the Maastricht School of Governance and methodological endorsement from the National Statistics Office of Mongolia. The activity is part of an ongoing project implemented by IOM with support from Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.  

For more information, please contact Erkhembayar Munkhbayar, communication consultant IOM Mongolia, at emunkhbayar@iom.int and +976-88101117 

Share this page via:

Related SDGs

SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
Regions
Office type
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Asia and the Pacific
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas (The)
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Central African Republic (the)
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros (the)
Congo (the)
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czechia
Democratic Republic of the Congo (the)
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic (the)
East and Horn of Africa
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Europe and Central Asia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia (the)
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Global Office in Brussels
Global Office in Washington
Greece
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
IOM Office at the United Nations
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Iraq
Ireland
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic (the)
Latin America and the Caribbean
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Manila Administrative Centre
Marshall Islands (the)
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia (Federated States of)
Middle East and North Africa
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
New Zealand
Niger (the)
Nigeria
North Macedonia
Norway
Pakistan
Palau
Panama
Panama Administrative Centre
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines (the)
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Republic of Moldova (the)
Romania
Russian Federation (the)
Rwanda
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Subregional Office in Brussels
Subregional Office in Pretoria
Sudan (the)
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic (the)
Tajikistan
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Türkiye
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
United Republic of Tanzania (the)
UNSC Resolution 1244-Administered Kosovo
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Viet Nam
West and Central Africa
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe